Metals Market Report Archive

The Mike Fuljenz Metals Market Report

October 2016 – Week 4 Edition

The Eagle that Landed at the Philadelphia Mint

The U. S. Mint’s Principal Deputy Director, Rhett Jeppson, invited me and over 50 public members to attend a Numismatic Forum on October 13, 2016 at the Federal Reserve Bank in Philadelphia.  We later privately toured the U. S. Mint, the home of Peter the Mint Eagle, the most visited tourist attraction in Philadelphia.  The purpose of the meeting was, in their words, “to gather leaders and stakeholders of the numismatic community to explore ways to stimulate and revitalize the hobby.”  With the 225th Anniversary of the U. S. Mint approaching next April, Mr. Jeppson saw a unique opportunity to examine and discuss the Mint’s past, present and future.

The U. S. Mint would like to appeal to a diverse group of customers, including all ages, races, sexes and religions.  Most importantly the U. S. Mint wants to help stimulate the numismatic industry.

Some of the best suggestions in our forum included children’s books on coins.  I suggested a book on a very special numismatic eagle.  In one form or another, the bald eagle has appeared on U.S. coinage since 1794, reminding Americans that the majestic bird serves as an official national symbol of our country’s power and prestige. It gained that recognition in 1782 while the fledging republic was governed under the Articles of Confederation.

Some U.S. coins portray eagles in repose; these include the Walking Liberty half dollar and the Peace dollar. Others depict them in heraldic form, as on the Kennedy half dollar and the Barber half dollar and quarter. Perhaps the most stunning, however, are those that show them in full flight, such as the Saint-Gaudens $20 gold piece and the Standing Liberty quarter.

One particular eagle occupies a niche that’s intriguing and unique in the annals of U.S. coinage. He even had a name – and why not, since he was the real thing- not just an image engraved on a piece of metal.

His name was Peter, and he’s said to have made his home for more than half a decade at the Philadelphia Mint in the early to mid- 19th century.

There’s little doubt that Peter existed. His stuffed body is on display at the current Philadelphia Mint, where it has been a popular attraction for decades for the building’s many visitors. But serious questions surround the circumstances of his tenancy while he was alive – especially which years he resided at the nation’s mother mint.

A U.S. Mint website for children states that “Peter, the original Mint Eagle” lived from 1830 to 1836 “at the first Philadelphia Mint.”

This appears to be at least partly inaccurate, since the first Philadelphia Mint, affectionately known as “Ye Olde Mint,” ceased operations in January 1833, when the much larger Second Philadelphia Mint began producing coins. And given the cramped quarters at the original mint, plus the fact that it was spread among several small buildings, it wouldn’t seem conducive to hosting a resident eagle, however friendly the bird might have been.

According to the Mint website, “The real Peter used to live up near the roof of the building. People would see him go out during the day to hunt for food and come home at night to sleep.” Given this, it seems far more likely that Peter’s adopted home was the Second Philadelphia Mint, a spacious edifice made of marble which resembled an ancient Greek temple, with large, graceful columns in the front and rear.

In 1972 while still in my teens, I wrote a short article about Peter the Eagle for the Southwest Louisiana Coin Club Newsletter, and in it I concluded that he was a resident of the mint for a period of six years in the late 1840s and early 1850s.

“Where he came from or why he chose the pressroom in the mint as his home can only be conjectured,” I wrote, “but he did receive special consideration from the mint employees and was permitted to come and go as he pleased.”

There seems to have been a pattern to Peter’s comings and goings. He was released each morning, according to most accounts, and spent the day foraging for food before returning to the mint each evening.

During these outings, he was a common sight in the skies over Philadelphia, then a small community by the 21st-century standards, even though it ranked among the three or four most populous cities in the nation at the time. U.S. Census figures show that “The City of Brotherly Love” had a population of 80,482 in 1830 and 121,376 in 1850. Since the countryside was largely undeveloped not far beyond the city limits, wild creatures could frequently be spotted even in the heart of the urban center.

The exact dates of Peter’s years at the mint hold significance for numismatic scholars, for he has been credited – rightly or wrongly – with inspiring some important U.S. coins. Perhaps the most significant of these is the beautiful Gobrecht dollar, a coin designed by Mint Chief Engraver Christian Gobrecht and first produced in 1836. Peter supposedly served as the model for the eagle on this much-acclaimed coin, but logically, that would be possible only if he was known at the mint in 1836 or before. Modern Mint officials might well have had this tale in mind when they approved the dates listed on their website.

Peter is also said to have inspired the eagle on the Flying Eagle cent, which was issued in only two years, 1857 and 1858. This could have been the case if his stay at the mint occurred during the period I citied in my article for the Southwest Louisiana Coin Club – of which, by the way, I was president at the time. Then again, some researches maintain that the eagle on the cent was based upon the bird on the Gobrecht dollar.

By all accounts, Peter was remarkably tame by eagle standards. He was given access to much of the mint’s work area, including the coining facilities, and frequently alighted on the coin presses themselves.

Sadly, this propensity ultimately led to his demise. One day, while he was perched on the flywheel of a coining press, the operator – not realizing Peter was there – activated the equipment and the regal bird’s wing got caught in the fast-spinning wheel. The wing was broken, and Peter died soon afterward.

The grieving mint employees took up a collection to hire a skilled taxidermist to stuff the bird’s body. It has been viewed by visitors to the second, third, and fourth Philadelphia mints since going on display well over a century ago.

As for Peter himself, he has become the stuff of legends and potentially a boost to the coin market in 2017 and beyond.

Gold Inched Up Last Week

Gold inched up last week but it still remains in the $1,260s based on short-term trends like: (1) the likelihood that the “establishment candidate” Hillary Clinton will likely be elected our next President in November, (2) The Federal Reserve will likely increase short-term interest rates in December, resulting in (3) a stronger U.S. dollar, which puts added pressure on gold.  Specifically, according to the latest readings from fivethirtyeight.com, Hillary Clinton’s election chances are 86% vs. 14% for Donald Trump, and the CME Group (cmegroup.com) now predicts a 70% chance for a rate increase at the mid-December Fed meeting. However, there are long-term indicators which should boost the gold price in 2017 and beyond.

 

Metals Market Report Archive >


Important Disclosure Notification: All statements, opinions, pricing, and ideas herein are believed to be reliable, truthful and accurate to the best of the Publisher's knowledge at this time. They are not guaranteed in any way by anybody and are subject to change over time. The Publisher disclaims and is not liable for any claims or losses which may be incurred by third parties while relying on information published herein. Individuals should not look at this publication as giving finance or investment advice or information for their individual suitability. All readers are advised to independently verify all representations made herein or by its representatives for your individual suitability before making your investment or collecting decisions. Arbitration: This company strives to handle customer complaint issues directly with customer in an expeditious manner. In the event an amicable resolution cannot be reached, you agree to accept binding arbitration. Any dispute, controversy, claim or disagreement arising out of or relating to transactions between you and this company shall be resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act and conducted in Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas. It is understood that the parties waive any right to a jury trial. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Reproduction or quotation of this newsletter is prohibited without written permission of the Publisher.